click for explanation and photo gallery


Home

About
- Minutes NAPB/ PBCC
- Committees

Hot Topics

Meetings

Awards

Careers

PROGRAMS

Partners

Links

Minutes for both PBCC and NAPB

Minutes for Teleconference (monthly) and National meeting (annually)
please contact the NAPB secretary for changes.

2010

 

NAPB Phone Call, Dec. 16, 2010, 1 - 2 PM CDT  

 Present:
David Stelly
Phil Simon
Mike Havey
Roy Scott
Tom Koch
Jodi Scheffler
Steve Baenziger
Todd Wehner
Rita Mumm
Karen Moldenhauer
Allen Van Deynze

Apologies:  Abdullah A. Jaradat, Mary Lou Arpaia, Anne Marie Thro, Carla Gala, Donn Cummings, Fikret Isik, Amy Iezzoni, Jamie Sherman, Carl Glasener, Liz Lee, Linda Wessel-Beaver, Maria Salas-Fernandez, Mitch McGrath, Mitch Tuinstra, Pat Byrne, Pat Brown, Paul Gepts, Randy Johnson, Ross Whetten, Brooks Blanche, Seth Murray, Shelly Jansky, Shelby Repinski, Kevin P. Smith, Bill Tracy

Call-in data: December 16 at 2 pm Eastern: 866-773-4970, code # 8604812. 

Minutes:

  1. Minutes of Last Meeting (Nov. 18): Dave Stelly  --   approved (no changes)
  2. Roll call
  3. Hosting of NAPB, e.g., by ASA or other organization
    • ASA :
    • Advantages:  front office, membership, … meetings?
    • Disadvantages -- Membership cost, .  (annual fee, or derived from meeting)
    • Other possibilities, besides ASA/CSSA:  ASTA (commercial group, contact:  Andy Laving or Ann Jorss),  Hort.Sci.,  NAPB can associate as needed with commercial entities.
    • $50 per head was deemed to be a very acceptable annual rate for membership, to be collected as part of annual meeting cost.
  1. Offices & Nominations:

Tentative schedule for Nominations: 

In terms of positions that may need to be filled, Steve Baenziger and Todd Wehner noted the need to look over liaisons, and consider new positions for NAPB archivist, web assistant, and PBCC Secretary): 

LIAISONS:   

    • Develop an appropriate list of positions liaison positions descriptions for inclusion in monthly NAPB mailout (Steve Baenziger and David Stelly will work on getting these prepared and included in the mailout).
    • Based on responses to inquiries sent by Todd Wehner to each liaison  --  some liaisons are willing to continue in their positions after the 2011 meeting, and the rest have not answered Todd's email.
    • By-laws describe the liaison positions, but we may need to add 'May be re-elected' to the By-laws. 
    • TERMS:  We could have everyone serve a 2-year term if they can be re-elected, and a 1-year term if they move up through other positions.

We should keep track of the NAPB and PBCC officers and By-laws on our websites, but without letting them get shuffled together.

            OTHER POSITIONS:

  1. Public relations newsletter (breeders, careers, events): Allen VanDeynze
  1. ITEMS FOR MONTHLY NAPB MAILOUT:

We want to have a periodic newsletter (monthly, e.g., 3rd week of month (Post-call suggestion by DS:  maybe week following conference call, allowing preparation before call and review at time of call, similar to minutes?)
ITEMS FOR JANUARY

  1. Next conference calls:
    • Jan 27,
    • Feb 17,
    • March 17,
    • April 21,
    • May 19, 
    • (Meeting May 23-25)
  1. Ad hoc plant breeding capacity study (Allen Van Deynze) --  UC Proposal for people to look at.   $5k from UC Davis.  Looking for $40k for 8month FT person to work on this.  Possible dollar from USDA, and plan to look commercial companies, and CAP.  Already have accumulated data  ---  ad hoc information solicited to update and detail the program.   Breeder resources available, with support (e.g., entomologist).  Aim will be to categorize.  Fred Bliss has already heavily engaged in this activity.
  1. Deferred and other items for next or other future conference call:

 

PBCC  CONFERENCE CALL NOTES 2010 Dec 07

 

  • Simon, Phil Chair (Convener)
  • Askew, George    (Admin. Advisor)
  • Cumming, Donn 
  • Byrne, Pat 
  • Moldenauer, Karen     
  • Stelly, David      
  • Wehner, Todd    
  • Murray, Seth     
  • Isik, Fikret 
  • Jansky, Shelly    

 Next conf call Jan 11 1pm CST

Phil:  In the last call, Mike Havey volunteered to generate draft of 1 pager on national capacity for breeding.  Dr. Askew had asked it be developed in time for the upcoming SAES director's meeting.   Mike (unable to participate) conveyed via Phil that his efforts underway in that direction.
Pat:  Should a longer document be prepared also?  One area, for example would be education.  Maybe create a Perspectives paper into Science.  Multi-authored letter.  Strategies for high-profile report would be welcome. 
Seth, who recently has worked on 1-2 such articles, one to be in Frontiers in Ecology (widely read by policy makers), noted that topics of a controversial nature are desirable.  1.  Perrenial grains.  2.  Harmony.  It was noted that they MUST BE WRITTEN FOR THE "LAY" PERSON.  Stelly noted that we could toss in a number of hot issues like:  germplasm usage, genetic engineering,  et cetera.  It is important for us to communicate that our breeding programs MUST BE ACTIVE TO HAVE THE CAPACITY TO REACT QUICKLY. (Decades are required to develop an effective breeding program, so continuity of breeding programs is essential if there is to be a capacity to react effectively and quickly to new challenges.)(Response times to critical challenges will often be quicker via active breeding programs than transgenic approaches, although the two are not mutually exclusive results).
Todd noted the website page in which it was guestimated how many plant breeders are needed.  This kind of info would be appropriate to include.
Regionality is important to capacity, however, the capacity needed gets very big with regionality factored in.  A distributed system is important.  What would be the minimum FTE for each crop. USDA's allocation are perhaps more based on stakeholder demands than acreage or value, per se.
How does Germplasm curation fit into capacity maintenance?


What is available at the global level in terms of education.  Todd noted that FAO has an ongoing study; Fred Bliss is involved.  Directory of Plant Breeders is a global effort. We need such a directory for the US.  What constitutes a PLANT BREEDING PROGRAM?  Given variation, there must be some flexibility in definitions.  The definition of regions becomes important.  (probably larger than individual states) .   If our focus is on the US, it would likely be quite complementary to the FAO effort, which is going to be global and likely more directed toward developing nations.  (Following the conference call, Ann Marie Thro provided additional information by email:

ABOUT FAO STUDIES, THERE IS A LOT IS GOING ON HERE ALSO.  IT MIGHT BE USEFUL TO PROVIDE THIS LIST THAT CAN BE QUICKLY GRASPED—AND CORRECTED, IF NEED BE.  HERE IS A LIST OF THE ONES I AM AWARE OF, FYI : 

·         Capacity SURVEY – FAO’s “Plant Breeding and Biotechnology Capacity“ (PBBC database) (on the GIPB web site) –data gathered in the late 1990s and early 2000s; over 80 developing countries, found declines in human resources for plant breeding.  This was the work of Elcio Guimaraes, former FAO plant breeding officer and initiator of GIPB, now CIAT Research Director for Latin America.  

·         Plant breeding capacity planning and assessment TOOL:  presented in poster format at the PBCC meeting in Aug 2010.  Under development.  Fred Bliss is the main author involved.   
§  A global e-consulation on these materials was held in Sept-Oct. 2010.   
§  Currently in progress is an ad–hoc expert review of the materials/the tool per se (i.e., not yet actually using the tools to conduct a survey)  (That may happen at a later time.  It is under discussion, but the current step is gathering input on the tool itself). 
§  Your input to the review is welcome.  I am the contact, so just let me know if you want to receive the materials for review.  This is not for the faint hearted:  substantive rigorous comment is needed.   
§  The next step will be developing an on-line interactive version for field testing.   

·         Global DIRECTORY of Plant Breeders –GIPB was asked to do this and agreed.   I am not further in the loop on exactly who is doing it, whether someone at FAO or another partner.   
§  A U. S. directory would be an appropriate contribution from PBCC, and possibly an easy “output” win. 
§  If the software were coordinated, the two directories could be subsets of each other. 

 Fred (Bliss) has been working on "Sustainability"
Tom Stalker's efforts, which earlier led to white paper on website still has "holes" in  the numerical layout … so not a complete picture … thus there is a reluctance to push it out the door.  The statewise posters … are informative but not coverage is incomplete and inconsistent. 
On the demand side:  is it possible to determine what the commercial demand is?  How do you define a plant breeding?  Not easy to assess.  If we are going to make the case for education, don't we need that kind of data? 
Define Breeder:  developing products for producers or people managing them.  Seed companies are reluctant to reveal the breeder numbers.  Fred Bliss' definition deals with development of improved types to be used by the farmer/producer.  One can be doing plant improvement (molecular approaches) without doing plant breeding, per se. 
This topic -- capacity and definition -- is critical; it demands our attention.  There could be a continuous MSc level student in the area of monitoring training and one hiring.  ~$35k/year per student.  That could almost be supported by NAPB. 
Many European companies now have to hire  biologists and then train them to plant breeding. Major plant breeding eduation sites are now gone … so they have few alternatives.
Many of the Dutch have IR degrees, sort of like MSc, not PhD.  England, France, Germany, Dutch: all breeding education is gone.  WE PROBABLY NEED TO CONSIDER THIS AS PART OF OUR OVERVIEW.
In the context of generating documents favoring funding …. Does Dr. Askew indicated that the division between NAPB and PBCC is more important in what one does with the data, and articles than in obtaining the information or development of the articles. 
At the May Meeting:  we will have sequential meetings of the NAPB and PBCC.  Is there a need to separate activities.   It was pointed out that there probably needs to be a Secretary position established within PBCC, so that Stelly does not have to do double duty.
We need the one-pager on Capacity.  We need to state deliverables to the public …. Et cetera.  Todd:  Undersecretary of Ag  said that she would try to keep Hatch funding in place.  Askew, so far, we have been successful in keeping Capacity Funding in place, while augmenting competitive funding.
Documents for Funding:  "Healthy Populations"  document. 
Phil inquired about the White Paper on Excellence in Science and Technology, which was deemed to be in good enough shape to push it out the door.  He suggested emphasis include impacts of new tools --  as a driver and as a user ….  Biometrics, NSF report alludes to development of plant breeding tools.  Almost all projects mention breeding, but very few include breeding.  The last step of successful research is usually to translate it and render it efficient.  A lot of plant breeding is translational sciences.
Stelly (one of the S&T authors) indicated general agreement on general suitability for publication of the S&T white paper as it stands now, but felt like tabular or graphic data about Plant Breeding education and roles and impacts would greatly augment the paper, similarly to the Stalker effort.  Stelly indicated that he would contact Tom (Stalker) to see what the prospects for completion of his earlier effort might be, and when, then report back to the group.


 

NAPB Phone Call Nov 18 2011

The teleconference number we use for our usual monthly calls:
866-773-4970.
Participant Pass code # is 8604812

PARTICIPANTS:

SYNOPSIS

The group deferred discussion of most topics until our next conference call, and focused most of this meeting on pressing questions about the schedule of events within our upcoming May 2011 meeting.             

Future calls:
PBCC-specific conference call will be announced by Phil -- Dec 07 -- time probably 1pm CST

                NAPB  conference call -- Dec 16 -- time probably 1pm CST (PBCC officers will also also invited)

In lieu of the normal complement of preceding emails to remind everyone about the meeting, a limited meeting agenda, and the mis-direction of an attempt to send out a last-minute email reminder led the group to defer discussion of non-urgent topics.  


NAPB Executive Committee Meeting (October 2010)
 --  Phone Conference, October 21, 2010, 1 - 2 PM CDT 

Present: 

  • Todd Wehner,
  • Ann-Marie Thro,
  • Donn Cummings,
  • Alan Van Deynze,
  • Dave Stelly,
  • Michael Havey,
  • Seth Murray,
  • Shelley Jansky,
  • Steve Baenziger,
  • Rita Mumm
  • Fikret Isik

Discussion about the 2012 meeting in Florida?? (somebody walked into my office and I was away from the phone for this part of the discussion)

Discussion occurred on possible web-based resources for plant breeding, both for instruction and general interest.  Reference was made to instructional videos on plant-breeding techniques by the University of Wisconsin and cytological techniques at the ASPB (???) website.  Although the group felt that such resources would be advantageous and useful, someone will have to take leadership to develop and coordinate materials from diverse institutions and topics.  The video resources could be hosted by NAPB, GIPB, or ASPB (more???) websites.  Sources of funding will have to be secured, possibly the USDA as a part of plant-breeding education grants. 

Discussion occurred on possible efforts to promote plant breeders for membership in the National Academy of Sciences (NAS).  Conversations with current NAS members indicated that it may be difficult for plant breeders to be elected to NAS because they do not generally produce seminal research that is widely cited and recognized.  The impact of cultivar development may be more difficult to objectively assess.  Some past members (John Axell and Stan Peloquin) of the NAS were promoting the development of a National Academy of Agriculture to foster recognition of agricultural scientists.  NAS is funded by the US Congress and it may be difficult to obtain new funding for a new national academy.  The suggestion was made for the chair of NAPB, possibly with additional co-signers, to prepare a letter to Roger Beachy, presently a NAS member and USDA administrator, to ask why so few plant breeders have been elected to the NAS and if there is a role USDA could play in promoting the agricultural sciences.  This letter should be distributed to the executive committee for comments and editing before being sent to Beachy. 

Upcoming EC telecons are scheduled as follows, to be held at 2 PM Eastern, 1 PM Central, 12 noon Mountain, and 11 AM Pacific Time:


 

 


 

Notes from the Business Meeting of the 4th Annual Plant Breeding Workshop of the PBCC (Link and pasted below)
August 15, 2010, 12noon to 5p CDT
Johnston, IA

The PBCC Business Meeting was opened by Phil Simon, Chair, PBCC.  Tabare Abadie of Pioneer delivered a warm welcome on behalf of the meeting host, Pioneer Hi-Bred International.

Todd Wehner asked the constituency to consider creation of the NAPB.  The vote taken was unanimously in favor of this motion.  Those desiring membership in NAPB were invited to star their names in the registration key at the main desk in the meeting hall. 

With results of elections and the progression of positions according to the bylaws, the EC Committee of NAPB/PBCC includes the following:

New officers for NAPB and PBCC:

            NAPB

Todd Wehner, President
Rita Mumm, Vice President
David Stelly, Secretary
Treasurer, Shelley Jansky
Web Editor, Seth Murray
Past President (to begin in 2011)

            PBCC

Phil Simon, Chair
Mike Havey, Vice Chair


New subcommittee leadership:

            Grand Challenges
ary Lou Arpaia, Chair
Vice Chair position open due to Mike Havey’s election to Vice Chair, PBCC
Secretary to be identified                                                                              

            Science, Technology, and Informatics  
Liz Lee, Chair
Mitch McGrath, Vice Chair
Ross Whetten, Secretary

            Communications & Outreach 
Allen Van Deynze, Chair           
Linda Wessel-Beaver, Vice Chair
Maria Salinas-Fernandez, Secretary
Shelby Repinski, Graduate Student Representative

            Awards                                               
Karen Moldenhauer, Chair
Brooks Blanche, Vice Chair
Secretary to be identified

            Education                                           
Donn Cummings, Chair
Jamie Sherman, Vice Chair
Pat Brown (UIUC), Secretary
Will identify graduate student representative

Representatives and Liaisons continue to serve another year.

Subcommittee break-out sessions were held and reports were delivered when the body reconvened.

Shelby Repinski reported on the results of the Delphi Study coordinated by UC-Davis to determine the curriculum content, skills, experiences, and specialties important in the education and training of future plant breeders.

The EC recognizes the need to be able to provide spot-on information in response to various types of requests on very short notice.  Because the EC must be empowered to request and gather information as needed, a rapid response group will be formed to promptly identify experts on various topics.   The rapid response group may be a part of the Communications Subcommittee.  A model for 1-pagers will be sought from Karl Glasener (ASA). 

Future Annual Meetings of the NAPB/PBCC will be held concurrently:

2010 Awards were presented by Jodi Scheffler:

Other special recognition was given to the following for their outstanding contributions to the PBCC and the newly created NAPB:

The meeting was closed with summary comments by Stephen Baenziger and parting remarks by Stephen Smith. 

A date was setfor the next EC telecon (2p Eastern, 1p Central, 12noon Mountain, and 11a Pacific Time):

 

 


 

 

  • Subcommittee leaders are invited to post minutes/updates to the NAPB/PBCC website.
  • The next EC telecon is scheduled as follows, to be held at 2p Eastern, 1p Central, 12noon Mountain, and 11a Pacific Time:
    • Thursday, July 15, 2010